and signs on the earth below,
blood and fire and billows of smoke.
The sun will be turned to darkness
and the moon to blood
before the coming of the great and glorious day of the Lord." Acts 2:-18-20
I prayed someone painted the day of Pentecost as a nightmare when I was looking for good images for this blog....The picture above is the pretty close to what i had in mind.Outside of everyone being white in the picture (which of course isn't true), the dark gloom resting above the audience as Peter is preaching his famous service seems to capture something we miss as Pentecostals:
The Infilling of the Spirit is frightening.
What I aim to do here is outlay a kind of theoretical theology of tongues. (through a series of post in coming weeks). I wrote a semi-hefty paper for school attempting exactly this, but I want to get at the role of tongues in our movement with less academic jargon. So i will touch on various thing we do well as a movement regarding one of our highest relics of our movement (Tongues) and where we are off Biblically.
I am a Pentecostal. I think Tongues are good, earth-shattering. I think they still exist for us today. I think we should all aim to speak them at least once in a while. I don't think we need to speak in tongues routinely to ensure our salvation. But at the end of the day my curiosity is this:
Why God chose speaking in tongues as the sign of spirit infilling in Acts 2 (as well for us today).
At the end of the day, God could have chosen any "sign" to represent the Spirit Infilling and the quote which we so proudly hail in the book of Joel about Young Men dreaming dreams, old men prophesying and everyone who calls on the name of the Lord being saved....well that quotation has nothing to do with tongues at first read. There really is nothing previous the Acts 2 passage that suggested tongues would be the sign of his infilling in the Old Testament....
I mean some people would point to the day of Pentecost being the reversal of the collapse of the Tower of Babel, which is certainly a possibility....But ask yourself this...is Tongues unifying when Interpretation isn't Present in a church service?
No! Tongues is a bunch of gibberish to the human ear (keep in mind the audience outside of the Upper Room thought tongues indicated they were drunk). If anything, the "unity" behind the language of tongues is that there is no unity. Each is speaking their own ugly language. A language so vulgar that Paul compares it to the tongues of invading soldiers from a foreign country in I Corinthians 14.
SO then, "why tongues?" I could quote at length some of the biggest scholars in our movement trying to get at the question and in every single case, they say there is nothing explicit in the Bible of the "Why" of tongues (why God chose it as the sign).
And then the irony of all ironies....
For Apostolic Pentecostals, the noises that come out of our mouth that we call speaking in tongues...is typically thought of as the evidence of the Presence of the Holy Ghost in the body of the one uttering the tongues...
And we love ourselves some of that evidence....the evidence whose "certainty" of salvation is a complete "uncertainty" in terms of it being in a foreign language that we can't even understand....
Oh it's so beautifully weird.....
Acts 2
For the greater part of my life, I have been absolutely embarrassed about tongues....It was so weird. So irrational. Of course it was only natural that God would choose me to have "the Gift of Tongues" as outlined in I Corinthians 14. I can tell you that if God gave me a pick of which Gift of the Spirit I would want, the Gift of Tongues would be the last one i would choose. I would have taken the Gift of Administration over the Gift of Tongues. Yet, it is the only Gift that I have seen work in my own life.....
But that didn't stop my doubts about tongues (some of which I still have).....
But last month I was reading Acts 2, and I noticed....Peter is fully aware of how weird tongues is and how it doesn't make sense to the observers. He starts off his speech to those outside acknowledging, "We aren't drunk, i swear!" But he doesn't claim it's ridiculous to come to that conclusion.
So what does Peter do? Does he ease the worries of the audience regarding the tongues? No! The humor is when he quotes Joel, he acknowledges the Weirdness of the event and says in a sense "In these last days, this is just the beginning of the weirdness..."
Think about it.. THose verses we so proudly preach from the book of Joel that PEter quotes.....We conveniently skip the verses about the darkened sun, the bloody moon, the reference to smoke, fire and blood...
Why do we ignore the heart of Peter's quotation? We like the stuff that PROVES our salvation (the tongues) but we don't wwant to acknowledge the context that this "evidence" exists in....
As the announcement of these last days.....TO which Peter uses Joel to paint the Last Days (to which we are living) as a kind of horror scene....
It's not that Peter eases the worries, and says "look, i know tongues is weird, but it's the evidence of the Holy Ghost and I can show you the scriptures to prove it." Except he didn't even have scripture to go to showing tongues as the evidence of the Holy Spirit.
Rather Peter says, "Yeah it's so weird...and beyond us..you know what else is weird in the end times? Smoke! Fire! Blood! a Black Sun! And a Moon that is Bleeding!..and it's going to get worse..and you killed Jesus you idiots!"
Acts 2 for the audience hearing Peter's speech is surely not a celebration....rather i can imagine being in the audience of Peter and thinking Peter a great scary story teller...Because he doesn't ease my anxieties about tongues, but he just makes them worse....
So bad that all the audience has left to say by the end of the speech, is wanting to know what they can do to be saved from the revealed truth (which is absolutely horrifying to them)...
And then we get Acts 2:38 as Peter's response....
For the Christian's in the Upper Room and those who witnessed the event, one thing is certain: God's ways on earth from this point forward will be fully beyond us and our liking....
Tongues isn't the ease of our salvation to which we know "we are saved" as the murdering audience wanted salvation to be (of which we as sinners are murderers of Christ ourselves in our sin)....
But rather, tongues is the Announcement of the Holy Spirit that this whole Christian thing isn't going to make sense....
It's going to be weird...
People are going to be upset.
People are going to call you Crazy....
People are going to be saved....
People are going to be healed....
And it's not up to you the believer to know every aspect about it (because if it was, wouldn't God cause tongues to be understood by the one who speaks the utterances)...
The Implications
DOn't get me wrong...I love Pentecostals. I love our movement...But i think our emphasis of Acts 2:38, causes us to miss the bigger context....
Spirit Infilling is a joyous and wonderful thing....It's lovely. I remember the feeling I had when I got it...I remember not being weirded out myself as the tongues started flowing.....
But the celebration of the Infilling was not and should never be "YAY! If i die today I will go to heaven..." (if that was the case i would have demanded to be killed on the spot of my infilling to ensure my salvation....
But rather the Infilling is an Event of Infinite Proportions to which we cannot fully grasp what is going on....It's just (along with repentance and baptism) our volunteering to be these vessels to which God can use and God letting us know through his grace that he has Chosen us through the infilling.
And how does God's choice of us play out? Through the Spirit Infilling which announces itself as kind of a monster who takes over our tongue and lets all kind of weird sounds come out.....
Which to the human Ear, don't make sense....
But then again, God's mercy and Grace and the Love he has for us doesn't make sense (it is beyond understanding)....But yet it is so....
So is tongues a symbol of God's inexplainable love that won't make sense to the unbeliever (and will probably offend the unbeliever), but to us it is real nonetheless (even when it doesn't make sense)?
About Peter
If you are offended, ask yourself if you are offended by my interpretation of Acts 2 or rather offended at me calling weird something which is so normal to us as Pentecostals?
Because, I know God is beyond comprehension. I know the Bible says that "Great is the mystery of Godliness." I also have never met a preacher who says he understands God's love. So I would argue that saying tongues is beyond us and that may be the very reason God chose tongues is nothing offensive to the believer but completely in line with the offensiveness and Absurdity of the Cross (that God could become man and be murdered by men) and what Christianity is....
For Peter, the one who made that famous Acts 2 speech to the accusers outside the upper room.....
Christianity was in many ways offensive to him later on in Acts (He was stubborn in regards to Cornelius and the Gentiles being saved until he saw that were filled with the Spirit themselves) and even in Galatians where Paul talks about calling out Peter for his contradictory example of being a Christian (who won't eat with Gentiles)....
But yet the offensiveness of Christianity did not stop him from proceeding to preach the Christian message....
And did it ever make sense to him?
Well at the end of the day, the one who experienced God's love via SPirit Infilling in Acts 2 ended his life to this effect-
Dying the same way as God, except as legend has it, he asked to be crucified upside down....
If we want to regulate Christianity and our movement to making sense and working in an orderly box we will get nowhere...The Monstrosity of Christ, of tongues, of the Crucifixion, is that it requires our emptying and understanding it will be uncomfortable for our flesh...